Thank you to my readers for the enormous response to my first post about Saudi women. Due to that response, I feel it pertinent to bring forward a new chapter, namely, discussing the crimes women are accused of, and the punishment they receive. One such issue is the punishment of a 19 year old girl who was gang-raped, and then jailed for six months and given 200 lashes.
You can find the related story here.
Discussion of Saudi victim’s increased punishment
The 19-year-old victim was sentenced last year to 90 lashes for meeting with an unrelated male, a former friend from whom she was retrieving photographs. The seven rapists, who abducted the pair, received sentences ranging from 10 months to five years in prison.
The victim’s attorney, Abdulrahman al-Lahim, contested the rapists’ sentence, contending there is a fatwa, or edict under Islamic law, that considers such crimes Hiraba (sinful violent crime) and the punishment should be death.
“After a year, the preliminary court changed the punishment and made it two to nine years for the defendants,” al-Lahim said of the new decision handed down Wednesday. “However, we were shocked that they also changed the victim’s sentence to be six months in prison and 200 lashes.”
The judges more than doubled the punishment for the victim because of “her attempt to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media,” according to a source quoted by Arab News, an English-language Middle Eastern daily newspaper.
Okay, so in all fairness, the rapists were punished as well, but why punish the victim? I understand the laws in Saudi Arabia are harsh on women, but when does it cross the line into a total and utter violation of human rights? First off, the girl is punished for meeting an unrelated Saudi male, and then, when she talks to the media(assumingly because she wants her story to be heard by a widespread group), she is punished more.
What would happen if laws such as this were put into place in the US? Would Ted Bundy have gone to the chair sooner for attempting to sway the people of the US and assure them of his innocence? Would the police forces of the US be punished for speaking with the media about a missing persons case?
I understand, of course, that it is illegal for women to venture out of their homes without a related male adult with them, but isn’t this crossing the line? Why just jump to this?
Lawyer blocked from defending client, license revoked
Judge Saad al-Muhanna from the Qatif General Court also barred al-Lahim from defending his client and revoked his law license, al-Lahim said. The attorney has been ordered to attend a disciplinary hearing at the Ministry of Justice next month.
Al-Lahim said he is appealing the decision to bar him from representing the victim and has a meeting with Justice Minister Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Ibrahim Al Al-Sheikh on Monday.
“Currently she doesn’t have a lawyer, and I feel they’re doing this to isolate her and deprive her from her basic rights,” al-Lahim said. “We will not accept this judgment and I’ll do my best to continue representing her because justice needs to take place.”
Al-Lahim said he wanted the Justice Ministry to take “a very clear standing” on the case, saying the decision is “judicial mutiny against reform that King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz started and against Saudi women who are being victimized because of such decisions.”
So, not only was the girl punished for speaking to the media and being raped, but then had no defense to help her in court. Seeing as women are not allowed to testify in court if there was a crime that a man witnessed, how can she defend herself? How can she stand up and get her story heard?
Fortunately, as all fairy tale stories go, this does have a somewhat happy ending. The rape victim’s husband stood up for her by saying she was a “crushed individual” who should not be treated as a criminal for what happened to her.
Husband speaks of injustice
“From the outset, my wife was dealt with as a guilty person who committed a crime,” said her 24-year-old husband. “She was not given any chance to prove her innocence or describe how she was a victim of multiple brutal rapes.”
It appears the girl has her husband’s support in her outcry that she was treated unfairly by the Saudi courts. There have been numerous human rights appeals to the king to drop the charges against this girl and grant her innocence.
Well, December 17th, 2007, that innocence came for her. The Saudi King Abdullah announced that he would pardon the Girl of Qatif and the other victim of their crimes. As is referenced in numerous articles, it is worth noting the king’s reason for the pardon. He states she has suffered enough to his liking, as she had already had her brother attempt to kill her, and had already tried to kill herself.
Now, briefly going over some other laws that bring women to a lower social level than men:
Women are not allowed to travel or have surgery without a man’s permission. They are not allowed to drive. They cannot participate in parliment discussions. A woman who is married to more than one man is considered an adultress and is subject to death by stoning, whereas a man can marry up to four times. Women have to surrender identification to male family members, and recently, could only open a bank account with the verification of her identity by a male relative.
Vice police, called mutawwa, patrol, preventing young men and women from mingling. When there was a girl’s school fire, the firefighters were prevented from entering to save the girls because they would be unveiled, and that would be unecessary temptation to the men.
Previous to a few years ago, women were not allowed to work, were only taught to read the Koran, and had very limited education. Yes, now, there are numerous women in the workplace, but the abaya dress code remains in place.
Men seem to be afraid to give women independence. Perhaps, there is a fear it would become a female-dominated government, and rights would be pushed unfairly in the opposite direction? Who knows, but a radical human rights change needs to happen to allow these women the freedom they need to be successful.
Let’s look at the other side, as well, now. There are certainly women in all Islamic countries that want freedom, that want the laws changed, but would they adhere to the change of no dress code? Doubtful, really. These women, while in desire of political change, are still devoted to their religion, and their husbands, and doubtless will continue to wear the black abaya as a symbol of respect for their religion. You most certainly see it in other countries. On a daily basis, I see an Islamic family who shops at my store whose mother and two daughters go everywhere dressed in their abayas.
Why allow the continuation of such atrocities? Why allow women to be killed to save the honor of their family? If a woman is raped, must she really be considered a stain to the honor of the family? Is this fair?
Stay tuned dear readers, for my next chapter. My recovery from the emotional torrent of this will be long, and the anger shall never leave.
-Horrified in Utah
Note: To help this cause, please donate to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali Security Trust, and the Foundation for the Freedom of Expression, whose street address is listed on that site. They both aim to better the treatment of women in Islamic countries, and help Muslim dissidents from around the world seek political asylum and protection from the dangers they face.
Comments on Musings